So, generally, there are two problems to overcome when a user encounters a multilingual site (imagine many languages) that may or may not be serving the correct language to them by default:

1. a user needs to know how to switch to a different language
2. a user needs to choose the correct language (their preferred language)

Bear in mind they are likely to be looking at the site in a language they don’t understand at this point.

My idea is more inclined towards solving the 2nd step. What if you could serve an image of a common object, and let the user type in the word they have for that object? The “common object” example I have here is an apple, but you may conceivably use images of the sun, the moon, a tree, etc.

The interface could look something like this:

(In the top right corner I’m using a language selector that I’ve used in past designs, using the presence of different languages — in this case, Chinese, French and English — to convey that there are further language settings, an attempt at addressing problem #1).

Basically, we provide a way for the user to type into a textbox the name of the object they see. The idea is that they would do this in whatever language they are already comfortable in. (In my example sketch, I’m writing “epal”, the word for “apple” in Malay.) There are languages where some nouns are similar, so this may need to be repeated a few times for an accurate detection.

There are obvious flaws with this visual language detection method:

1. if you can’t see the image — if you’re not a sighted user or if you’re using a device that cannot render an image — this cannot be used
2. choosing culturally-neutral images might not be trivial
3. there needs to be some way of indicating (with little or no text) that you’re supposed to type in the name of the object you see, and that’s a hard concept to convey
4. from a user flow perspective, this could be very confusing to be suddenly served an image of an apple…

Some good things about this:

1. you can conceivably make a decent language guess if you have a few images, and you only need a fairly limited corpus to search through
2. a user won’t have to wander through a big list of languages they don’t care about in order to find the one that matters to them

From Wikipedia:

The Year is intended to address issues of linguistic diversity (in the context of cultural diversity), respect for all languages, and multilingualism. The resolution also discussed language issues in the United Nations itself.

The list of projects undertaken for the year is impressive, and of note is an informal page listing activities supporting IYL 2008. UNESCO has also updated their Atlas of World’s Languages in Danger, which is well worth a look.

March 2008 seems a long time ago! Stephanie Booth and I hosted a round table discussion (or a “Core Conversation”) called “Opening the Web to Linguistic Realities” at SXSW Interactive, on the topic of multilingualism and the Web. Joi sketched out a list of things we discussed on the day, for which I’m grateful, because it was rather impossible to take note of what was being discussed while facilitating the conversation. I got sidetracked by books since then, so never followed up with notes; it remains to be seen if the ad-hoc recording we made on the day turn out well.